Windows XP + UKAW
mf-news at freexp.co.uk
Sam Dez 3 15:25:00 CET 2005
On the 03.12.05 at 14:26, Michael Heydekamp <my-news at freexp.de> wrote:
> Martin Foster <mf-news at freexp.co.uk> wrote on 03.12.05:
>> On the 03.12.05 at 00:52, Michael Heydekamp <my-news at freexp.de> wrote:
>>> Ehhmm - which FreeXP version are you using, BTW?
>>> There is a problem with RC4 and UKAW because UKAW opens XP.EXE in
>>> R/W mode. This doesn't work anymore as the former XP.OVR is now an
>>> integral part of XP.EXE.
>> Ah, aha!
> Look at the size of XP.EXE...
Yeah, it's huge!
>>> There is an RC5 test version available (same as RC4 but XP.EXE and
>>> XP.OVR reside as two different files again). See:
>> OK, got it now and .....
>>> But this shouldn't be the problem in your case as you would get
>>> different results then (UKAW would complain about a wrong XP
>> ..... that was the problem.
> Did UKAW complain?
It complained about being out of environment space, that's all.
> My impression from your initial post was that it did simply nothing.
Yes, that's right. It sat there doing nothing for around 5 seconds and
>> UKAW is now working perfectly again - Pheeeeeeew! ;-)
> I suggest that you use the UKAW patch tool to avoid it's annoying
> header munging:
Got it, thanks.
> After applying it, you should send 'clean' RFC headers as with other
OK, I've applied it prior to writing this message so let's see what
> Happy FreeXP'ing... :-)
Yes indeed ;-))
I really must update our English support site with all this valuable
information that you've given me. Once again, many thanks.
FreeXP English Support Site
Mehr Informationen über die Support-List Mailingliste